FAF deciding on filters on post to be syndicated:

The Only Pre-checked “Preview” Checkbox In InDesign

Array ( [post_title] => The Only Pre-checked “Preview” Checkbox In InDesign [post_content] =>

I understand the logic behind leaving InDesign’s Preview checkboxes unchecked: Rendering complex content or effects could have an impact on redraw times, aggravating users. (Of course, what really aggravates users is having to check those dadgum Preview checkboxes.)

Of course, if you check a Preview checkbox once, it remains checked in future sessions (unless you wipe out your preferences); this gives you the option of choosing how Preview behaves. But why would you not want to preview the results of your choices in a dialog?

But here’s something ironic—there is one Preview checkbox that’s pre-checked in InDesign. It’s the (Read more...)

[post_date_gmt] => 2014-06-01 00:09:29 [post_date] => 2014-05-31 17:09:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2014-06-01 00:09:29 [post_modified] => 2014-05-31 17:09:29 [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [guid] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/?p=1252 [meta] => Array ( [enclosure] => Array ( [0] => ) [syndication_source] => Adobe InDesign – Claudia McCue [syndication_source_uri] => http://claudiamccue.com [syndication_source_id] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed_id] => 94 [syndication_permalink] => http://claudiamccue.com/2014/05/the-only-pre-checked-preview-checkbox-in-indesign/ [syndication_item_hash] => Array ( [0] => 5e6b514ea7bb966d8d124a1d10f294f4 [1] => 373311fc59fc04b4696f28c8ffb55423 ) ) [post_type] => post [post_author] => 673 [tax_input] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [0] => 6 ) [post_tag] => Array ( ) [post_format] => Array ( ) ) [post_name] => the-only-pre-checked-preview-checkbox-in-indesign )

Doing filter:faf_remove_html

Decide filter: Returning post, everything seems orderly :The Only Pre-checked “Preview” Checkbox In InDesign

Array ( [post_title] => The Only Pre-checked “Preview” Checkbox In InDesign [post_content] => I understand the logic behind leaving InDesign’s Preview checkboxes unchecked: Rendering complex content or effects could have an impact on redraw times, aggravating users. (Of course, what really aggravates users is having to check those dadgum Preview checkboxes.) Of course, if you check a Preview checkbox once, it remains checked in future sessions (unless you wipe out your preferences); this gives you the option of choosing how Preview behaves. But why would you not want to preview the results of your choices in a dialog? But here’s something ironic—there is one Preview checkbox that’s pre-checked in InDesign. It’s the (Read more...) [post_date_gmt] => 2014-06-01 00:09:29 [post_date] => 2014-05-31 17:09:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2014-06-01 00:09:29 [post_modified] => 2014-05-31 17:09:29 [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [guid] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/?p=1252 [meta] => Array ( [enclosure] => Array ( [0] => ) [syndication_source] => Adobe InDesign – Claudia McCue [syndication_source_uri] => http://claudiamccue.com [syndication_source_id] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed_id] => 94 [syndication_permalink] => http://claudiamccue.com/2014/05/the-only-pre-checked-preview-checkbox-in-indesign/ [syndication_item_hash] => Array ( [0] => 5e6b514ea7bb966d8d124a1d10f294f4 [1] => 373311fc59fc04b4696f28c8ffb55423 ) ) [post_type] => post [post_author] => 673 [tax_input] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [0] => 6 ) [post_tag] => Array ( ) [post_format] => Array ( ) ) [post_name] => the-only-pre-checked-preview-checkbox-in-indesign [post_excerpt] => )

FAF deciding on filters on post to be syndicated:

Is [Paper] White? Sometimes…

Array ( [post_title] => Is [Paper] White? Sometimes… [post_content] =>

New users of InDesign are sometimes confused by the [Paper] swatch— “Is it white? What color is it?”

I explain it as “No ink prints here,” because “knock out” often doesn’t make sense to newbies who know nothing about printing.

But there’s something you might not know about [Paper]— you can change its appearance. Even though the protective brackets around the name imply it’s ineditable (try saying that quickly, and it always comes out as “inedible”), double-click it and you’ll discover that you can concoct a new CMYK, RGB, or Lab color (you can’t shop in Pantone, Toyo, etc. (Read more...)

[post_date_gmt] => 2014-05-26 15:40:02 [post_date] => 2014-05-26 08:40:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2014-05-26 15:40:02 [post_modified] => 2014-05-26 08:40:02 [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [guid] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/?p=1244 [meta] => Array ( [enclosure] => Array ( [0] => ) [syndication_source] => Adobe InDesign – Claudia McCue [syndication_source_uri] => http://claudiamccue.com [syndication_source_id] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed_id] => 94 [syndication_permalink] => http://claudiamccue.com/2014/05/is-paper-white-sometimes/ [syndication_item_hash] => Array ( [0] => bc349e8a665444a62cdfc681edcb8145 [1] => cd94ab4814df74dc0e14179178b8c89a ) ) [post_type] => post [post_author] => 673 [tax_input] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [0] => 6 ) [post_tag] => Array ( ) [post_format] => Array ( ) ) [post_name] => is-paper-white-sometimes )

Doing filter:faf_remove_html

Decide filter: Returning post, everything seems orderly :Is [Paper] White? Sometimes…

Array ( [post_title] => Is [Paper] White? Sometimes… [post_content] => New users of InDesign are sometimes confused by the [Paper] swatch— “Is it white? What color is it?” I explain it as “No ink prints here,” because “knock out” often doesn’t make sense to newbies who know nothing about printing. But there’s something you might not know about [Paper]— you can change its appearance. Even though the protective brackets around the name imply it’s ineditable (try saying that quickly, and it always comes out as “inedible”), double-click it and you’ll discover that you can concoct a new CMYK, RGB, or Lab color (you can’t shop in Pantone, Toyo, etc. (Read more...) [post_date_gmt] => 2014-05-26 15:40:02 [post_date] => 2014-05-26 08:40:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2014-05-26 15:40:02 [post_modified] => 2014-05-26 08:40:02 [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [guid] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/?p=1244 [meta] => Array ( [enclosure] => Array ( [0] => ) [syndication_source] => Adobe InDesign – Claudia McCue [syndication_source_uri] => http://claudiamccue.com [syndication_source_id] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed_id] => 94 [syndication_permalink] => http://claudiamccue.com/2014/05/is-paper-white-sometimes/ [syndication_item_hash] => Array ( [0] => bc349e8a665444a62cdfc681edcb8145 [1] => cd94ab4814df74dc0e14179178b8c89a ) ) [post_type] => post [post_author] => 673 [tax_input] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [0] => 6 ) [post_tag] => Array ( ) [post_format] => Array ( ) ) [post_name] => is-paper-white-sometimes [post_excerpt] => )

FAF deciding on filters on post to be syndicated:

InDesign Inner Shadow Effect Misbehavior

Array ( [post_title] => InDesign Inner Shadow Effect Misbehavior [post_content] =>

I recently encountered a weird problem with the Inner Shadow effect in InDesign. It took a bit of digging to figure out how to fix it.

Graphic frames with an Inner Shadow looked fine in InDesign, even with Overprint Preview on. The outcome was fine if the file was exported with PDF/X-4 or any other PDF preset using Acrobat 5 or later compatibility. However, the printer had insisted that the client use a supplied PDF preset based on the PDF/X-3 spec, which flattens transparency.

1_Overprint-ON

The image frames looked fine in Acrobat as long as Simulate Overprinting was turned on in (Read more...)

[post_date_gmt] => 2014-05-26 03:52:46 [post_date] => 2014-05-25 20:52:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2014-05-26 03:52:46 [post_modified] => 2014-05-25 20:52:46 [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [guid] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/?p=1236 [meta] => Array ( [enclosure] => Array ( [0] => ) [syndication_source] => Adobe InDesign – Claudia McCue [syndication_source_uri] => http://claudiamccue.com [syndication_source_id] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [rss:comments] => http://claudiamccue.com/2014/05/indesign-inner-shadow-effect-misbehavior/#comments [wfw:commentRSS] => http://claudiamccue.com/2014/05/indesign-inner-shadow-effect-misbehavior/feed/ [syndication_feed] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed_id] => 94 [syndication_permalink] => http://claudiamccue.com/2014/05/indesign-inner-shadow-effect-misbehavior/ [syndication_item_hash] => Array ( [0] => 1a7be0bf369ae6abea5df9eedff28148 [1] => 6a58d5b6d078a7aefeb8e37b3b8020f8 ) ) [post_type] => post [post_author] => 673 [tax_input] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [0] => 6 ) [post_tag] => Array ( ) [post_format] => Array ( ) ) [post_name] => indesign-inner-shadow-effect-misbehavior )

Doing filter:faf_remove_html

Decide filter: Returning post, everything seems orderly :InDesign Inner Shadow Effect Misbehavior

Array ( [post_title] => InDesign Inner Shadow Effect Misbehavior [post_content] => I recently encountered a weird problem with the Inner Shadow effect in InDesign. It took a bit of digging to figure out how to fix it. Graphic frames with an Inner Shadow looked fine in InDesign, even with Overprint Preview on. The outcome was fine if the file was exported with PDF/X-4 or any other PDF preset using Acrobat 5 or later compatibility. However, the printer had insisted that the client use a supplied PDF preset based on the PDF/X-3 spec, which flattens transparency. The image frames looked fine in Acrobat as long as Simulate Overprinting was turned on in (Read more...) [post_date_gmt] => 2014-05-26 03:52:46 [post_date] => 2014-05-25 20:52:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2014-05-26 03:52:46 [post_modified] => 2014-05-25 20:52:46 [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [guid] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/?p=1236 [meta] => Array ( [enclosure] => Array ( [0] => ) [syndication_source] => Adobe InDesign – Claudia McCue [syndication_source_uri] => http://claudiamccue.com [syndication_source_id] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [rss:comments] => http://claudiamccue.com/2014/05/indesign-inner-shadow-effect-misbehavior/#comments [wfw:commentRSS] => http://claudiamccue.com/2014/05/indesign-inner-shadow-effect-misbehavior/feed/ [syndication_feed] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed_id] => 94 [syndication_permalink] => http://claudiamccue.com/2014/05/indesign-inner-shadow-effect-misbehavior/ [syndication_item_hash] => Array ( [0] => 1a7be0bf369ae6abea5df9eedff28148 [1] => 6a58d5b6d078a7aefeb8e37b3b8020f8 ) ) [post_type] => post [post_author] => 673 [tax_input] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [0] => 6 ) [post_tag] => Array ( ) [post_format] => Array ( ) ) [post_name] => indesign-inner-shadow-effect-misbehavior [post_excerpt] => )

FAF deciding on filters on post to be syndicated:

When Smart Objects Are Not So Smart

Array ( [post_title] => When Smart Objects Are Not So Smart [post_content] =>

Smart Objects offer some wonderful flexibility in Photoshop; they allow endless transformations without a cumulative loss of data, because each transformation is a fresh start from the original data, whether that data is raster or vector. Why, you can even open a Camera Raw file as a Smart Object, which allows you to go back to the Camera Raw data for color correction, noise reduction, or straightening—it’s the ultimate in non-destructive editing.

But there are two scenarios in which Smart Objects act a bit dumb.

Rendering Vector Content

If you create a Shape layer or text layer in Photoshop, then (Read more...)

[post_date_gmt] => 2013-12-02 02:26:57 [post_date] => 2013-12-01 19:26:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2013-12-02 02:26:57 [post_modified] => 2013-12-01 19:26:57 [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [guid] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/?p=1212 [meta] => Array ( [enclosure] => Array ( [0] => ) [syndication_source] => Adobe InDesign – Claudia McCue [syndication_source_uri] => http://claudiamccue.com [syndication_source_id] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed_id] => 94 [syndication_permalink] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/12/when-smart-objects-are-not-so-smart/ [syndication_item_hash] => Array ( [0] => 4193fc26499165a1f4e301c4ba389345 [1] => 7b62779ae5c17e3c0ee2e2b8bd47ca26 ) ) [post_type] => post [post_author] => 673 [tax_input] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [0] => 6 ) [post_tag] => Array ( ) [post_format] => Array ( ) ) [post_name] => when-smart-objects-are-not-so-smart )

Doing filter:faf_remove_html

Decide filter: Returning post, everything seems orderly :When Smart Objects Are Not So Smart

Array ( [post_title] => When Smart Objects Are Not So Smart [post_content] => Smart Objects offer some wonderful flexibility in Photoshop; they allow endless transformations without a cumulative loss of data, because each transformation is a fresh start from the original data, whether that data is raster or vector. Why, you can even open a Camera Raw file as a Smart Object, which allows you to go back to the Camera Raw data for color correction, noise reduction, or straightening—it’s the ultimate in non-destructive editing. But there are two scenarios in which Smart Objects act a bit dumb. Rendering Vector Content If you create a Shape layer or text layer in Photoshop, then (Read more...) [post_date_gmt] => 2013-12-02 02:26:57 [post_date] => 2013-12-01 19:26:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2013-12-02 02:26:57 [post_modified] => 2013-12-01 19:26:57 [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [guid] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/?p=1212 [meta] => Array ( [enclosure] => Array ( [0] => ) [syndication_source] => Adobe InDesign – Claudia McCue [syndication_source_uri] => http://claudiamccue.com [syndication_source_id] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed_id] => 94 [syndication_permalink] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/12/when-smart-objects-are-not-so-smart/ [syndication_item_hash] => Array ( [0] => 4193fc26499165a1f4e301c4ba389345 [1] => 7b62779ae5c17e3c0ee2e2b8bd47ca26 ) ) [post_type] => post [post_author] => 673 [tax_input] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [0] => 6 ) [post_tag] => Array ( ) [post_format] => Array ( ) ) [post_name] => when-smart-objects-are-not-so-smart [post_excerpt] => )

FAF deciding on filters on post to be syndicated:

Stubborn InDesign Swatches

Array ( [post_title] => Stubborn InDesign Swatches [post_content] =>

Remember the old InDesign Stubborn Swatch problem? We rarely see that any more.

IDML_5

My standard fix for Evil InDesign files is probably your primary voodoo weapon, too—export to IDML to scrub off the rust, open the IDML file, and you’re a hero.

But I encountered a customer file this week that wouldn’t respond to treatment. Looking at the Document History in the Component Information display, I discovered that the file started in QuarkXPress. Then, once it was converted to InDesign, it was worked on and saved over 70 times between June 2007 (PC; CS) and July 2013 (Mac; CS5.5). (Read more...)

[post_date_gmt] => 2013-07-11 05:23:41 [post_date] => 2013-07-10 22:23:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2013-07-11 05:23:41 [post_modified] => 2013-07-10 22:23:41 [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [guid] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/?p=1178 [meta] => Array ( [enclosure] => Array ( [0] => ) [syndication_source] => Adobe InDesign – Claudia McCue [syndication_source_uri] => http://claudiamccue.com [syndication_source_id] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [rss:comments] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/07/stubborn-indesign-swatches/#comments [wfw:commentRSS] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/07/stubborn-indesign-swatches/feed/ [syndication_feed] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed_id] => 94 [syndication_permalink] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/07/stubborn-indesign-swatches/ [syndication_item_hash] => Array ( [0] => be9c8789be851b9c2b454e93312b2c47 [1] => a9fcbc31337c43cac4572dacd781d05d ) ) [post_type] => post [post_author] => 673 [tax_input] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [0] => 6 ) [post_tag] => Array ( ) [post_format] => Array ( ) ) [post_name] => stubborn-indesign-swatches )

Doing filter:faf_remove_html

Decide filter: Returning post, everything seems orderly :Stubborn InDesign Swatches

Array ( [post_title] => Stubborn InDesign Swatches [post_content] => Remember the old InDesign Stubborn Swatch problem? We rarely see that any more. My standard fix for Evil InDesign files is probably your primary voodoo weapon, too—export to IDML to scrub off the rust, open the IDML file, and you’re a hero. But I encountered a customer file this week that wouldn’t respond to treatment. Looking at the Document History in the Component Information display, I discovered that the file started in QuarkXPress. Then, once it was converted to InDesign, it was worked on and saved over 70 times between June 2007 (PC; CS) and July 2013 (Mac; CS5.5). (Read more...) [post_date_gmt] => 2013-07-11 05:23:41 [post_date] => 2013-07-10 22:23:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2013-07-11 05:23:41 [post_modified] => 2013-07-10 22:23:41 [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [guid] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/?p=1178 [meta] => Array ( [enclosure] => Array ( [0] => ) [syndication_source] => Adobe InDesign – Claudia McCue [syndication_source_uri] => http://claudiamccue.com [syndication_source_id] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [rss:comments] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/07/stubborn-indesign-swatches/#comments [wfw:commentRSS] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/07/stubborn-indesign-swatches/feed/ [syndication_feed] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed_id] => 94 [syndication_permalink] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/07/stubborn-indesign-swatches/ [syndication_item_hash] => Array ( [0] => be9c8789be851b9c2b454e93312b2c47 [1] => a9fcbc31337c43cac4572dacd781d05d ) ) [post_type] => post [post_author] => 673 [tax_input] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [0] => 6 ) [post_tag] => Array ( ) [post_format] => Array ( ) ) [post_name] => stubborn-indesign-swatches [post_excerpt] => )

FAF deciding on filters on post to be syndicated:

Creative Cloud: Some Thoughts on Cumulus Adobus

Array ( [post_title] => Creative Cloud: Some Thoughts on Cumulus Adobus [post_content] =>

CC_Icon_mine

On Monday, May 6th, in the AdobeMAX keynote prefaced (somewhat ominously) by a driving instrumental snippet from the Allman Brothers’ “Whipping Post,” Adobe announced that the next versions of its creative tools will be designated “CC” — and will be available only via Creative Cloud subscriptions. This means the end of perpetual (conventional) licenses. Adobe will continue to sell perpetual licenses for CS6, but only by download — no boxed software. The new CC tools will become available on June 17th.

There are compelling new features in CC:

Photoshop

[post_date_gmt] => 2013-05-12 19:50:39 [post_date] => 2013-05-12 12:50:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2013-05-12 19:50:39 [post_modified] => 2013-05-12 12:50:39 [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [guid] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/?p=1162 [meta] => Array ( [enclosure] => Array ( [0] => ) [syndication_source] => Adobe InDesign – Claudia McCue [syndication_source_uri] => http://claudiamccue.com [syndication_source_id] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [rss:comments] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/05/creative-cloud-some-thoughts-on-cumulus-adobus/#comments [wfw:commentRSS] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/05/creative-cloud-some-thoughts-on-cumulus-adobus/feed/ [syndication_feed] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed_id] => 94 [syndication_permalink] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/05/creative-cloud-some-thoughts-on-cumulus-adobus/ [syndication_item_hash] => Array ( [0] => 35684c6f5a280202b9987b84eb567ab4 [1] => ea9fd21bc68db17309b9a7f85f0e970b ) ) [post_type] => post [post_author] => 673 [tax_input] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [0] => 6 ) [post_tag] => Array ( ) [post_format] => Array ( ) ) [post_name] => creative-cloud-some-thoughts-on-cumulus-adobus )

Doing filter:faf_remove_html

Decide filter: Returning post, everything seems orderly :Creative Cloud: Some Thoughts on Cumulus Adobus

Array ( [post_title] => Creative Cloud: Some Thoughts on Cumulus Adobus [post_content] => On Monday, May 6th, in the AdobeMAX keynote prefaced (somewhat ominously) by a driving instrumental snippet from the Allman Brothers’ “Whipping Post,” Adobe announced that the next versions of its creative tools will be designated “CC” — and will be available only via Creative Cloud subscriptions. This means the end of perpetual (conventional) licenses. Adobe will continue to sell perpetual licenses for CS6, but only by download — no boxed software. The new CC tools will become available on June 17th. There are compelling new features in CC: Photoshop Camera Shake Reduction Camera Raw as a filter (Read more...) [post_date_gmt] => 2013-05-12 19:50:39 [post_date] => 2013-05-12 12:50:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2013-05-12 19:50:39 [post_modified] => 2013-05-12 12:50:39 [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [guid] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/?p=1162 [meta] => Array ( [enclosure] => Array ( [0] => ) [syndication_source] => Adobe InDesign – Claudia McCue [syndication_source_uri] => http://claudiamccue.com [syndication_source_id] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [rss:comments] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/05/creative-cloud-some-thoughts-on-cumulus-adobus/#comments [wfw:commentRSS] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/05/creative-cloud-some-thoughts-on-cumulus-adobus/feed/ [syndication_feed] => http://www.claudiamccue.com/category/indesign/feed/ [syndication_feed_id] => 94 [syndication_permalink] => http://claudiamccue.com/2013/05/creative-cloud-some-thoughts-on-cumulus-adobus/ [syndication_item_hash] => Array ( [0] => 35684c6f5a280202b9987b84eb567ab4 [1] => ea9fd21bc68db17309b9a7f85f0e970b ) ) [post_type] => post [post_author] => 673 [tax_input] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [0] => 6 ) [post_tag] => Array ( ) [post_format] => Array ( ) ) [post_name] => creative-cloud-some-thoughts-on-cumulus-adobus [post_excerpt] => )

Page not found | Gurus Unleashed
404

Sorry!

Page Not Found

The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.

Please try using our search box below to look for information on the internet.